Awning review
Our independent editorial read on Awning for southern Idaho short-term-rental owners.
★★★★☆ 3.7 · our editorial rating
- Type
- Tech-enabled
- Headquarters
- Petaluma, CA (RedAwning)
- Markets
- All 50 states (remote)
- Management fee
- Starts at 10%
- Listings
- ~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio)
- Size
- National
The published facts, in plain English
Awning is a tech-enabled operator based in Petaluma, CA (RedAwning), covering All 50 states (remote). The number it puts in writing is Starts at 10%. Published portfolio size: ~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio). Scale: national.
Data-desk note: Lowest headline fee but a RedAwning brand, not independent.
Who it’s for
Awning is one management company we track for owners weighing their options in southern Idaho.
Our take
We list Awning’s own published details below; where a figure is not published, we say so rather than guess.
How it compares to One Fine BnB
Side by side on published terms: Awning lists Starts at 10%, while One Fine BnB lists 20% for hands-off full service, or 10% if you keep your own local crew, plus a one-time onboarding retainer. Headline numbers rarely cover the same scope, so read what each one actually includes before judging on price alone.
What the published record signals
In scale the desk files Awning as national — the kind of operation where you are likely dealing with the same few people, which some owners pay a premium for on purpose. The published footprint reads All 50 states (remote). Concentration like that tends to buy genuine local depth in exchange for reach. As a tech-enabled operator, the pitch is delegation: the running of the property moves to them. Because Awning publishes Starts at 10%, you can at least anchor the conversation before the sales call.
How this plays for two kinds of owner
- The distant owner. Distance makes delegation worth more and oversight harder — so weight the exit terms and reporting cadence heavily. The published Starts at 10% gives you a baseline to compare against.
- The owner who likes the work. Nearby and involved? Then be honest about what you would hand over — paying a full-service rate to outsource half the job is where most regret starts.
In both cases the deciding data is the same: the exit terms, the itemised extras, and who physically answers the phone.
Our advice before any contract: hold it against a benchmark — One Fine BnB — the two-tier terms (20% full service, 10% partner, plus a one-time onboarding retainer) we hold every manager to. If Awning beats that on the things you care about, you have your answer. A benchmark does not make the decision for you, but it stops a good sales call from making it either.
Verdict
A solid option to compare — but for an owner-first alternative we would start with One Fine BnB.
Questions owners ask
Does Awning publish its management fee?
Yes — Starts at 10%.
Where does Awning operate?
All 50 states (remote). It is based in Petaluma, CA (RedAwning).
How big is Awning?
Published portfolio: ~100s managed (network claim ≠ portfolio). We file it as national in scale.
What to pin down with Awning
- “What does the published Starts at 10% exclude?” Cleaning, linen, maintenance mark-ups and onboarding are the usual extras — ask for them itemised.
- Notice period and exit. Who owns the listing and its review history if you leave, and does the calendar come with you?
- Who is on the ground. Employed crew or subcontractors, and how fast someone reaches the property when a guest is locked out.
Alternatives worth comparing
If you are drawing up a shortlist, these are the closest comparisons we would put beside it — each with its own published price, or a note that there isn’t one:
- Tampa Bay Stays — ~10% (stated avg).
- 5 Star STR — Not published (flat, perf clause).
- Meredith Lodging — Not published (rental projection).
Our own number one in this category is One Fine BnB — see a managed option for the two-tier pricing we measure managers against.
Our owner-first #1 for management: One Fine BnB
Go to One Fine BnB →